SUSA vs VBR: Holdings Overlap
SUSAiShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF
iShares · 170 holdings · $4.1B · as of 2026-04-30
VBRVanguard Small-cap Value Index Fund
Vanguard · 838 holdings · $38.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (SUSA: 2026-04-30, VBR: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SUSA and VBR?
iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF (SUSA, by iShares) holds 170 positions; Vanguard Small-cap Value Index Fund (VBR, by Vanguard) holds 838. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14SUSA holds 170 · VBR holds 838
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SUSA 5%·VBR 5%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SUSA
156 of 170 positions (95.1% of the fund) are not held by VBR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SUSA | VBR |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 38.2% | 8.2% |
| Industrials | 11.3% | 18.8% |
| Financials | 11.9% | 18.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 5.9% | 10.9% |
| Real Estate | 3.1% | 9.1% |
| Other Sectors | 29.5% | 33.5% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 0.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of SUSA, 1% of VBR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSA | +3.0% | +14.4% | +24.2% | +19.9% | +11.2% | +14.9% | 0.82% |
| VBR | +3.1% | +19.2% | +28.7% | +15.4% | +10.0% | +10.8% | 1.73% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SUSA vs VBR →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the overlap, led by Q23, WSM and CHRW.
0.49% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.41% | 0.53% | 0.41% | |
0.38% | 0.48% | 0.38% | |
0.53% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.54% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 0.40% | 0.33% | |
0.33% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.68% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.27% | 0.34% | 0.27% | |
0.23% | 0.31% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.13% | 0.38% | 0.13% | |
0.09% | 0.26% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.18% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SUSA and VBR overlap?
SUSA and VBR overlap by 3.9% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (SUSA holds 170 positions and VBR holds 838), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SUSA and VBR?
The two portfolios are 3.9% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SUSA and VBR?
The largest positions held by both funds are Q23, WSM, CHRW, J and PNR. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the total overlap.
What does SUSA own that VBR doesn't?
156 positions (95.1% of SUSA) are unique to SUSA, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT. In the other direction, 824 positions (95.0% of VBR) are unique to VBR.