TCAF vs IGM: Holdings Overlap
TCAFT. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
T. Rowe Price · 92 holdings · $8.3B · as of 2026-03-31
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
iShares · 288 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are TCAF and IGM?
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF, by T. Rowe Price) holds 92 positions; iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM, by iShares) holds 288. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 34.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 34.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18TCAF holds 92 · IGM holds 288
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- TCAF 38%·IGM 54%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in TCAF
74 of 92 positions (62.2% of the fund) are not held by IGM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | TCAF | IGM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 30.5% | 82.6% |
| Health Care | 17.6% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 8.2% | 17.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.1% | 0.0% |
| Utilities | 10.2% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 17.9% | 0.1% |
| Unclassified | 3.3% | 0.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of TCAF, 0% of IGM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCAF | +3.1% | +12.1% | +18.5% | +18.6% | — | — | 0.45% |
| IGM | +4.5% | +26.9% | +40.7% | +35.3% | +19.1% | +23.9% | 0.13% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in TCAF vs IGM →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by MSFT, AAPL and NVDA.
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 7.12% | 8.23% | 7.12% |
|---|---|---|---|
 AAPLApple Inc. COM | 5.95% | 8.76% | 5.95% |
 NVDANVIDIA Corp. COM | 5.34% | 8.44% | 5.34% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 4.05% | 4.65% | 4.05% |
 METAMeta Platforms, Inc., Class A | 3.93% | 4.17% | 3.93% |
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 3.08% | 8.16% | 3.08% |
 AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. COM | 2.22% | 2.19% | 2.19% |
 MUMicron Technology Inc. COM | 0.70% | 2.51% | 0.70% |
 KLACKLA Corp. COM NEW | 0.56% | 1.27% | 0.56% |
 ANETArista Networks Inc COM SHS | 0.28% | 0.84% | 0.28% |
 CIENCiena Corporation COM NEW | 0.20% | 0.36% | 0.20% |
 CDNSCadence Design Systems, Inc. COM | 0.19% | 0.50% | 0.19% |
 WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 0.64% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 PTCPTC Inc COM | 2.20% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 GOOGAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL C | 0.09% | 3.73% | 0.09% |
 TYLTyler Technologies Inc. COM | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.04% |
 BSYBentley Systems Incorporated COM CL B | 0.59% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 AURAurora Innovation Inc CLASS A COM | 0.48% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do TCAF and IGM overlap?
TCAF and IGM overlap by 34.1% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (TCAF holds 92 positions and IGM holds 288), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both TCAF and IGM?
The two portfolios are 34.1% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of TCAF and IGM?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, AAPL, NVDA, GOOGL and META. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does TCAF own that IGM doesn't?
74 positions (62.2% of TCAF) are unique to TCAF, led by AMZN, CNP and NI. In the other direction, 270 positions (45.6% of IGM) are unique to IGM.