TDIV vs CGDV: Holdings Overlap
TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
First Trust · 95 holdings · $4.4B · as of 2026-03-31
CGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETF
Capital Group · 52 holdings · $37.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (TDIV: 2026-03-31, CGDV: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are TDIV and CGDV?
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV, by First Trust) holds 95 positions; Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV, by Capital Group) holds 52. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 24.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 24.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11TDIV holds 95 · CGDV holds 52
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- TDIV 46%·CGDV 27%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in TDIV
84 of 95 positions (54.3% of the fund) are not held by CGDV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | TDIV | CGDV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 80.7% | 34.4% |
| Communication Services | 14.1% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | 2.1% | 13.0% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 9.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 7.9% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 24.1% |
| Unclassified | 2.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of TDIV, 0% of CGDV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDIV | +4.3% | +21.7% | +31.1% | +27.8% | +17.1% | +17.5% | 1.29% |
| CGDV | +4.9% | +18.2% | +28.6% | +24.3% | — | — | 1.14% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in TDIV vs CGDV →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by MSFT, AVGO and TSM.
7.87% | 5.81% | 5.81% | |
8.09% | 5.16% | 5.16% | |
3.77% | 2.16% | 2.16% | |
2.04% | 3.02% | 2.04% | |
1.88% | 3.12% | 1.88% | |
1.94% | 1.75% | 1.75% | |
8.07% | 1.60% | 1.60% | |
7.64% | 1.21% | 1.21% | |
2.16% | 0.92% | 0.92% | |
0.88% | 1.42% | 0.88% | |
1.26% | 0.84% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do TDIV and CGDV overlap?
TDIV and CGDV overlap by 24.2% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (TDIV holds 95 positions and CGDV holds 52), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both TDIV and CGDV?
The two portfolios are 24.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of TDIV and CGDV?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, AVGO, TSM, CSCO and AMAT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does TDIV own that CGDV doesn't?
84 positions (54.3% of TDIV) are unique to TDIV, led by IBM, QCOM and ADI. In the other direction, 41 positions (70.9% of CGDV) are unique to CGDV.