USMC vs ESGV: Holdings Overlap
USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
Principal · 26 holdings · $3.6B · as of 2026-03-31
ESGVVanguard Esg U.S. Stock ETF
Vanguard · 1235 holdings · $13.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (USMC: 2026-03-31, ESGV: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are USMC and ESGV?
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC, by Principal) holds 26 positions; Vanguard Esg U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV, by Vanguard) holds 1235. They have 19 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 44.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 44.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 19USMC holds 26 · ESGV holds 1235
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- USMC 79%·ESGV 48%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in USMC
7 of 26 positions (20.5% of the fund) are not held by ESGV.
Only in ESGV
1216 of 1235 positions (52.1% of the fund) are not held by USMC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | USMC | ESGV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 26.6% | 41.9% |
| Financials | 20.4% | 11.6% |
| Communication Services | 14.1% | 12.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.2% | 11.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 10.2% | 3.6% |
| Other Sectors | 20.2% | 18.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USMC | +2.9% | +11.9% | +21.9% | +20.8% | +14.5% | — | 0.74% |
| ESGV | +3.6% | +13.9% | +23.4% | +21.2% | +11.9% | — | 0.84% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in USMC vs ESGV →
Shared Holdings(19)
The top 10 shared positions account for 85% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
7.57% | 8.37% | 7.57% | |
6.70% | 7.62% | 6.70% | |
4.91% | 5.66% | 4.91% | |
5.37% | 3.74% | 3.74% | |
3.62% | 4.40% | 3.62% | |
4.50% | 3.50% | 3.50% | |
4.11% | 2.34% | 2.34% | |
2.36% | 2.08% | 2.08% | |
2.95% | 1.84% | 1.84% | |
2.23% | 1.50% | 1.50% | |
4.56% | 1.29% | 1.29% | |
4.39% | 0.93% | 0.93% | |
4.58% | 0.72% | 0.72% | |
4.49% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
3.37% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
4.65% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
3.52% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
3.11% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
2.20% | 0.53% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do USMC and ESGV overlap?
USMC and ESGV overlap by 44.4% of portfolio weight. They share 19 holdings (USMC holds 26 positions and ESGV holds 1235), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both USMC and ESGV?
The two portfolios are 44.4% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of USMC and ESGV?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL and AMZN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 85% of the total overlap.
What does USMC own that ESGV doesn't?
7 positions (20.5% of USMC) are unique to USMC, led by JNJ, BRK-B and GE. In the other direction, 1216 positions (52.1% of ESGV) are unique to ESGV.