VB vs SCHA: Holdings Overlap
VBVanguard Small-cap Index Fund
Vanguard · 1312 holdings · $82.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Schwab · 1705 holdings · $23.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (VB: 2026-03-31, SCHA: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are VB and SCHA?
Vanguard Small-cap Index Fund (VB, by Vanguard) holds 1312 positions; Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA, by Schwab) holds 1705. They have 933 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 44.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 44.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 933VB holds 1312 · SCHA holds 1705
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- VB 45%·SCHA 78%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in VB
379 of 1312 positions (55.1% of the fund) are not held by SCHA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | VB | SCHA |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 13.8% | 22.1% |
| Industrials | 21.2% | 17.7% |
| Financials | 13.4% | 15.1% |
| Health Care | 11.6% | 13.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.5% | 9.3% |
| Other Sectors | 28.5% | 21.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 0.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of VB, 1% of SCHA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VB | +2.5% | +19.5% | +29.1% | +15.9% | +8.1% | +11.3% | 1.18% |
| SCHA | +1.0% | +22.8% | +36.7% | +17.1% | +7.9% | +10.8% | 1.02% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in VB vs SCHA →
Shared Holdings(933)
The top 10 shared positions account for 5% of the overlap, led by LITE, ATI and RVMD.
0.35% | 1.29% | 0.35% | |
0.28% | 0.50% | 0.28% | |
0.26% | 0.65% | 0.26% | |
0.24% | 0.49% | 0.24% | |
0.22% | 0.37% | 0.22% | |
0.22% | 0.46% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 0.50% | 0.21% | |
0.18% | 0.31% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.24% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.26% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.26% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 0.30% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.24% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.28% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.25% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.56% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.26% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.20% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.35% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.31% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.42% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.26% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 0.27% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 0.23% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 0.24% | 0.14% |
Showing the top 250 of 933 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do VB and SCHA overlap?
VB and SCHA overlap by 44.5% of portfolio weight. They share 933 holdings (VB holds 1312 positions and SCHA holds 1705), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both VB and SCHA?
The two portfolios are 44.5% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of VB and SCHA?
The largest positions held by both funds are LITE, ATI, RVMD, NXT and ECHO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 5% of the total overlap.
What does VB own that SCHA doesn't?
379 positions (55.1% of VB) are unique to VB, led by EME, NRG and ATO. In the other direction, 772 positions (21.5% of SCHA) are unique to SCHA.