VOT vs IWP: Holdings Overlap
VOTVanguard Mid-cap Growth Index Fund
Vanguard · 130 holdings · $19.9B · as of 2026-03-31
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are VOT and IWP?
Vanguard Mid-cap Growth Index Fund (VOT, by Vanguard) holds 130 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277. They have 72 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 43.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 43.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 72VOT holds 130 · IWP holds 277
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- VOT 55%·IWP 60%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in VOT
58 of 130 positions (44.9% of the fund) are not held by IWP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | VOT | IWP |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 25.1% | 24.4% |
| Information Technology | 22.5% | 15.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 15.2% | 21.2% |
| Health Care | 10.5% | 14.9% |
| Financials | 8.5% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 18.1% | 15.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | +1.9% | +10.1% | +7.1% | +14.7% | +5.4% | +11.9% | 0.59% |
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in VOT vs IWP →
Shared Holdings(72)
The top 10 shared positions account for 40% of the overlap, led by VRT, HWM and PWR.
2.49% | 3.43% | 2.49% | |
2.40% | 3.32% | 2.40% | |
2.14% | 2.25% | 2.14% | |
1.74% | 2.51% | 1.74% | |
1.62% | 2.33% | 1.62% | |
1.40% | 1.92% | 1.40% | |
1.39% | 1.57% | 1.39% | |
1.32% | 1.83% | 1.32% | |
1.32% | 1.82% | 1.32% | |
1.28% | 1.46% | 1.28% | |
1.16% | 1.61% | 1.16% | |
1.14% | 1.51% | 1.14% | |
1.11% | 1.53% | 1.11% | |
1.01% | 1.33% | 1.01% | |
0.92% | 1.26% | 0.92% | |
0.91% | 2.49% | 0.91% | |
0.84% | 1.16% | 0.84% | |
0.70% | 0.96% | 0.70% | |
0.98% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
0.68% | 0.75% | 0.68% | |
0.65% | 0.87% | 0.65% | |
0.63% | 1.73% | 0.63% | |
0.63% | 0.88% | 0.63% | |
0.63% | 0.86% | 0.63% | |
0.63% | 0.73% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do VOT and IWP overlap?
VOT and IWP overlap by 43.2% of portfolio weight. They share 72 holdings (VOT holds 130 positions and IWP holds 277), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both VOT and IWP?
The two portfolios are 43.2% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of VOT and IWP?
The largest positions held by both funds are VRT, HWM, PWR, RCL and NET. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 40% of the total overlap.
What does VOT own that IWP doesn't?
58 positions (44.9% of VOT) are unique to VOT, led by CEG, STX and MSI. In the other direction, 205 positions (39.5% of IWP) are unique to IWP.