XLB vs IYJ: Holdings Overlap
XLBState Street® Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 25 holdings · $8.4B · as of 2026-08-06
IYJiShares U.S. Industrials ETF
iShares · 196 holdings · $2.0B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (XLB: 2026-08-06, IYJ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are XLB and IYJ?
State Street® Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLB, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 25 positions; iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ, by iShares) holds 196. They have 10 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 10XLB holds 25 · IYJ holds 196
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- XLB 36%·IYJ 5%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in XLB
15 of 25 positions (63.7% of the fund) are not held by IYJ.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | XLB | IYJ |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 99.9% | 5.5% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 71.0% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 18.9% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 3.9% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLB | +2.6% | +17.5% | +22.4% | +10.0% | +6.8% | +10.2% | 1.61% |
| IYJ | +2.4% | +14.0% | +19.0% | +16.9% | +9.3% | +12.7% | 0.70% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in XLB vs IYJ →
Shared Holdings(10)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by CRH, SHW and VMC.
4.26% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
5.22% | 0.94% | 0.94% | |
4.51% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
4.25% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
2.93% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
3.50% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
3.30% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
3.00% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
2.91% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
2.25% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do XLB and IYJ overlap?
XLB and IYJ overlap by 4.5% of portfolio weight. They share 10 holdings (XLB holds 25 positions and IYJ holds 196), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both XLB and IYJ?
The two portfolios are 4.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of XLB and IYJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are CRH, SHW, VMC, MLM and DOW. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does XLB own that IYJ doesn't?
15 positions (63.7% of XLB) are unique to XLB, led by LIN, NEM and FCX. In the other direction, 186 positions (95.3% of IYJ) are unique to IYJ.