XLB vs IYM: Holdings Overlap
XLBState Street® Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 25 holdings · $8.4B · as of 2026-08-06
IYMiShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
iShares · 38 holdings · $1.1B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (XLB: 2026-08-06, IYM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are XLB and IYM?
State Street® Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLB, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 25 positions; iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM, by iShares) holds 38. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 55.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 55.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14XLB holds 25 · IYM holds 38
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- XLB 59%·IYM 69%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in XLB
11 of 25 positions (40.6% of the fund) are not held by IYM.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | XLB | IYM |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 99.9% | 88.4% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 11.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLB | +2.6% | +17.5% | +22.4% | +10.0% | +6.8% | +10.2% | 1.61% |
| IYM | +5.2% | +23.1% | +34.0% | +13.6% | +9.2% | +10.8% | 1.24% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in XLB vs IYM →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the overlap, led by LIN, NEM and FCX.
13.29% | 19.89% | 13.29% | |
6.60% | 10.51% | 6.60% | |
5.75% | 7.25% | 5.75% | |
4.81% | 5.80% | 4.81% | |
4.73% | 4.75% | 4.73% | |
4.74% | 4.43% | 4.43% | |
4.25% | 3.38% | 3.38% | |
2.40% | 2.15% | 2.15% | |
2.13% | 2.13% | 2.13% | |
2.89% | 2.00% | 2.00% | |
1.98% | 2.57% | 1.98% | |
2.87% | 1.77% | 1.77% | |
1.78% | 1.40% | 1.40% | |
1.00% | 0.82% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do XLB and IYM overlap?
XLB and IYM overlap by 55.2% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (XLB holds 25 positions and IYM holds 38), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both XLB and IYM?
The two portfolios are 55.2% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of XLB and IYM?
The largest positions held by both funds are LIN, NEM, FCX, ECL and APD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the total overlap.
What does XLB own that IYM doesn't?
11 positions (40.6% of XLB) are unique to XLB, led by SHW, VMC and CTVA. In the other direction, 24 positions (31.0% of IYM) are unique to IYM.