XLG vs IVV: Holdings Overlap
Invesco · 51 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 503 holdings · $901.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (XLG: 2026-04-30, IVV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are XLG and IVV?
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG, by Invesco) holds 51 positions; iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV, by iShares) holds 503. They have 51 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 59.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 59.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 51XLG holds 51 · IVV holds 503
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- XLG 100%·IVV 60%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in XLG
Every position in XLG is also held by IVV, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | XLG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 43.7% | 32.6% |
| Communication Services | 17.0% | 10.5% |
| Financials | 9.6% | 12.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.3% | 9.8% |
| Health Care | 7.0% | 9.4% |
| Other Sectors | 11.0% | 24.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLG | +3.7% | +7.2% | +17.9% | +22.2% | +14.3% | +16.6% | 0.63% |
| IVV | +3.4% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +21.3% | +13.4% | +15.4% | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in XLG vs IVV →
Shared Holdings(51)
The top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
13.04% | 7.56% | 7.56% | |
10.71% | 6.65% | 6.65% | |
8.14% | 4.91% | 4.91% | |
6.96% | 3.63% | 3.63% | |
6.03% | 2.99% | 2.99% | |
4.83% | 2.62% | 2.62% | |
4.80% | 2.39% | 2.39% | |
3.60% | 2.23% | 2.23% | |
2.89% | 1.87% | 1.87% | |
2.34% | 1.57% | 1.57% | |
2.27% | 1.42% | 1.42% | |
1.99% | 1.30% | 1.30% | |
1.73% | 1.27% | 1.27% | |
1.49% | 1.05% | 1.05% | |
1.56% | 0.97% | 0.97% | |
1.49% | 0.91% | 0.91% | |
1.21% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
1.10% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
1.06% | 0.72% | 0.72% | |
0.97% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
1.00% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
0.92% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.85% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
1.55% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
1.11% | 0.59% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do XLG and IVV overlap?
XLG and IVV overlap by 59.5% of portfolio weight. They share 51 holdings (XLG holds 51 positions and IVV holds 503), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both XLG and IVV?
The two portfolios are 59.5% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of XLG and IVV?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the total overlap.
What does XLG own that IVV doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in XLG is also held by IVV. In the other direction, 452 positions (40.2% of IVV) are unique to IVV.