XMHQ vs IJH: Holdings Overlap
XMHQInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Invesco · 80 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-04-30
IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
iShares · 399 holdings · $126.1B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (XMHQ: 2026-04-30, IJH: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are XMHQ and IJH?
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ, by Invesco) holds 80 positions; iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH, by iShares) holds 399. They have 80 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 21.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 21.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 80XMHQ holds 80 · IJH holds 399
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- XMHQ 100%·IJH 21%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in XMHQ
Every position in XMHQ is also held by IJH, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | XMHQ | IJH |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 28.5% | 25.3% |
| Health Care | 19.7% | 8.9% |
| Financials | 15.1% | 14.6% |
| Information Technology | 8.4% | 12.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.5% | 11.3% |
| Other Sectors | 18.8% | 27.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | +4.3% | +16.0% | +18.7% | +14.6% | +10.6% | +13.0% | 0.55% |
| IJH | +3.1% | +18.4% | +26.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.2% | 1.14% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in XMHQ vs IJH →
Shared Holdings(80)
The top 10 shared positions account for 30% of the overlap, led by FTI, UTHR and RGLD.
4.95% | 0.87% | 0.87% | |
3.98% | 0.80% | 0.80% | |
2.38% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
2.72% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
3.00% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
3.55% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
2.35% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
2.53% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
1.94% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
2.22% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
1.52% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
1.99% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
2.74% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
1.72% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.93% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
2.61% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
1.44% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.80% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
1.41% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
2.13% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.47% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.48% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
2.54% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.46% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.30% | 0.31% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do XMHQ and IJH overlap?
XMHQ and IJH overlap by 21.0% of portfolio weight. They share 80 holdings (XMHQ holds 80 positions and IJH holds 399), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both XMHQ and IJH?
The two portfolios are 21.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of XMHQ and IJH?
The largest positions held by both funds are FTI, UTHR, RGLD, CRS and TWLO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 30% of the total overlap.
What does XMHQ own that IJH doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in XMHQ is also held by IJH. In the other direction, 319 positions (78.4% of IJH) are unique to IJH.