XMHQ vs IJJ: Holdings Overlap
XMHQInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Invesco · 80 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-04-30
IJJiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
iShares · 301 holdings · $9.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (XMHQ: 2026-04-30, IJJ: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are XMHQ and IJJ?
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ, by Invesco) holds 80 positions; iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ, by iShares) holds 301. They have 55 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 14.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 14.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 55XMHQ holds 80 · IJJ holds 301
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- XMHQ 56%·IJJ 15%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in XMHQ
25 of 80 positions (44.3% of the fund) are not held by IJJ.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | XMHQ | IJJ |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 28.5% | 19.0% |
| Financials | 15.1% | 22.4% |
| Health Care | 19.7% | 3.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.5% | 12.4% |
| Information Technology | 8.4% | 7.0% |
| Other Sectors | 18.8% | 35.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | +4.3% | +16.0% | +18.7% | +14.6% | +10.6% | +13.0% | 0.55% |
| IJJ | +3.0% | +15.1% | +23.8% | +12.8% | +9.2% | +10.5% | 1.56% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in XMHQ vs IJJ →
Shared Holdings(55)
The top 10 shared positions account for 40% of the overlap, led by AA, CCK and GME.
1.94% | 1.09% | 1.09% | |
1.41% | 0.72% | 0.72% | |
1.24% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
1.20% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
3.55% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
2.74% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
1.50% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
1.05% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
1.52% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
2.53% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.72% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.47% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.72% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.13% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.66% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.50% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.11% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.80% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.99% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.54% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.86% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.47% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.14% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.87% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.40% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do XMHQ and IJJ overlap?
XMHQ and IJJ overlap by 14.7% of portfolio weight. They share 55 holdings (XMHQ holds 80 positions and IJJ holds 301), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both XMHQ and IJJ?
The two portfolios are 14.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of XMHQ and IJJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are AA, CCK, GME, TTC and ILMN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 40% of the total overlap.
What does XMHQ own that IJJ doesn't?
25 positions (44.3% of XMHQ) are unique to XMHQ, led by FTI, UTHR and TWLO. In the other direction, 246 positions (84.5% of IJJ) are unique to IJJ.