XMMO vs IJH: Holdings Overlap
XMMOInvesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
Invesco · 76 holdings · $7.2B · as of 2026-04-30
IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
iShares · 399 holdings · $126.1B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (XMMO: 2026-04-30, IJH: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are XMMO and IJH?
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO, by Invesco) holds 76 positions; iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH, by iShares) holds 399. They have 76 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 27.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 27.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 76XMMO holds 76 · IJH holds 399
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- XMMO 100%·IJH 27%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in XMMO
Every position in XMMO is also held by IJH, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | XMMO | IJH |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 40.3% | 25.3% |
| Information Technology | 15.0% | 12.3% |
| Financials | 3.8% | 14.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.1% | 11.3% |
| Health Care | 6.3% | 8.9% |
| Other Sectors | 28.2% | 27.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMMO | +1.1% | +17.4% | +26.1% | +25.9% | +14.3% | +18.6% | 0.60% |
| IJH | +3.1% | +18.4% | +26.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.2% | 1.14% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in XMMO vs IJH →
Shared Holdings(76)
The top 10 shared positions account for 25% of the overlap, led by FTI, CW and FLEX.
3.60% | 0.87% | 0.87% | |
3.91% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
2.56% | 0.75% | 0.75% | |
2.58% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
2.60% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
2.63% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
2.26% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
1.74% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
2.32% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
2.21% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
2.86% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
2.21% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
1.50% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
1.25% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
1.77% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
2.03% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
1.25% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
1.92% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
1.35% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
1.60% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
1.16% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
1.49% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
1.09% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.13% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.05% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do XMMO and IJH overlap?
XMMO and IJH overlap by 27.4% of portfolio weight. They share 76 holdings (XMMO holds 76 positions and IJH holds 399), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both XMMO and IJH?
The two portfolios are 27.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of XMMO and IJH?
The largest positions held by both funds are FTI, CW, FLEX, WWD and RGLD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 25% of the total overlap.
What does XMMO own that IJH doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in XMMO is also held by IJH. In the other direction, 323 positions (72.0% of IJH) are unique to IJH.