XRT vs IYC: Holdings Overlap
XRTState Street® SPDR® S&P® Retail ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 75 holdings · $485M · as of 2026-08-06
IYCiShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
iShares · 166 holdings · $1.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (XRT: 2026-08-06, IYC: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are XRT and IYC?
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Retail ETF (XRT, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 75 positions; iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC, by iShares) holds 166. They have 34 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 15.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 15.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 34XRT holds 75 · IYC holds 166
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- XRT 48%·IYC 37%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in XRT
41 of 75 positions (52.0% of the fund) are not held by IYC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | XRT | IYC |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 79.2% | 69.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 19.8% | 11.1% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 14.0% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 5.2% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of XRT, 0% of IYC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XRT | +4.2% | +7.0% | +12.7% | +12.1% | +0.7% | +8.9% | 0.74% |
| IYC | +2.2% | +1.0% | +3.6% | +13.4% | +6.4% | +11.6% | 0.49% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in XRT vs IYC →
Shared Holdings(34)
The top 10 shared positions account for 73% of the overlap, led by AMZN, ORLY and TJX.
1.51% | 14.92% | 1.51% | |
1.36% | 1.37% | 1.36% | |
1.27% | 2.86% | 1.27% | |
1.27% | 4.26% | 1.27% | |
1.23% | 4.58% | 1.23% | |
1.45% | 1.18% | 1.18% | |
1.30% | 1.01% | 1.01% | |
1.51% | 0.96% | 0.96% | |
1.34% | 0.87% | 0.87% | |
1.36% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
1.43% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.53% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
1.51% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
1.50% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.46% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.55% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.22% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.56% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.39% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.39% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
1.13% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
1.16% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
1.62% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.58% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.55% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do XRT and IYC overlap?
XRT and IYC overlap by 15.7% of portfolio weight. They share 34 holdings (XRT holds 75 positions and IYC holds 166), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both XRT and IYC?
The two portfolios are 15.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of XRT and IYC?
The largest positions held by both funds are AMZN, ORLY, TJX, COST and WMT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 73% of the total overlap.
What does XRT own that IYC doesn't?
41 positions (52.0% of XRT) are unique to XRT, led by REAL, GRPN and ANF. In the other direction, 132 positions (62.7% of IYC) are unique to IYC.