XT vs SMH: Holdings Overlap
XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
iShares · 219 holdings · $3.9B · as of 2026-04-30
VanEck · 25 holdings · $71.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (XT: 2026-04-30, SMH: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are XT and SMH?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT, by iShares) holds 219 positions; VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH, by VanEck) holds 25. They have 12 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 18.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 18.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 12XT holds 219 · SMH holds 25
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- XT 20%·SMH 56%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in XT
207 of 219 positions (80.1% of the fund) are not held by SMH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | XT | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 42.5% | 99.9% |
| Health Care | 23.2% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 9.6% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.2% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 5.2% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 10.1% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of XT, 0% of SMH).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XT | +1.0% | +19.3% | +36.3% | +17.3% | +7.2% | +14.1% | 6.87% |
| SMH | +0.2% | +61.8% | +100.8% | +55.9% | +34.9% | +34.9% | 0.19% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in XT vs SMH →
Shared Holdings(12)
The top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by TXN, NVDA and ADI.
5.04% | 4.61% | 4.61% | |
4.01% | 19.64% | 4.01% | |
3.99% | 4.70% | 3.99% | |
2.23% | 7.79% | 2.23% | |
1.43% | 1.24% | 1.24% | |
0.77% | 4.23% | 0.77% | |
0.71% | 4.68% | 0.71% | |
0.83% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.24% | 1.23% | 0.24% | |
0.16% | 2.35% | 0.16% | |
0.11% | 2.43% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 2.50% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do XT and SMH overlap?
XT and SMH overlap by 18.8% of portfolio weight. They share 12 holdings (XT holds 219 positions and SMH holds 25), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both XT and SMH?
The two portfolios are 18.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of XT and SMH?
The largest positions held by both funds are TXN, NVDA, ADI, AVGO and NXPI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does XT own that SMH doesn't?
207 positions (80.1% of XT) are unique to XT, led by MSFT, TSLA and LLY. In the other direction, 13 positions (43.9% of SMH) are unique to SMH.