AAXJ vs CGXU: Holdings Overlap
AAXJiShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
iShares · 916 holdings · $3.8B · as of 2026-04-30
CGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Capital Group · 72 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (AAXJ: 2026-04-30, CGXU: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are AAXJ and CGXU?
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF (AAXJ, by iShares) holds 916 positions; Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU, by Capital Group) holds 72. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 18.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 18.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13AAXJ holds 916 · CGXU holds 72
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- AAXJ 36%·CGXU 23%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in AAXJ
903 of 916 positions (64.1% of the fund) are not held by CGXU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | AAXJ | CGXU |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 39.6% | 20.3% |
| Industrials | 3.5% | 15.2% |
| Financials | 13.9% | 12.6% |
| Materials | 1.5% | 13.6% |
| Communication Services | 6.4% | 10.5% |
| Other Sectors | 14.7% | 19.4% |
| Unclassified | 20.0% | 4.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (20% of AAXJ, 5% of CGXU).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAXJ | -0.6% | +22.4% | +35.6% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +8.9% | 1.36% |
| CGXU | +2.8% | +19.2% | +34.7% | +16.5% | — | — | 4.84% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in AAXJ vs CGXU →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by TSMWF, 000660 and 005930.
 TSMWFTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 16.28% | 6.83% | 6.83% |
|---|---|---|---|
 000660SK hynix Inc | 4.63% | 3.27% | 3.27% |
 005930Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | 6.78% | 3.10% | 3.10% |
 700Tencent Holdings Ltd. | 3.70% | 1.27% | 1.27% |
 1299AIA Group Ltd. | 1.09% | 1.10% | 1.09% |
 RELIANCEReliance Industries Ltd | 0.88% | 1.25% | 0.88% |
 BHARTIBharti Airtel Ltd | 0.48% | 1.20% | 0.48% |
 005380Hyundai Motor Co | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.46% |
 105560KB Financial Group Inc | 0.38% | 1.24% | 0.38% |
 SESea Ltd. | 0.32% | 0.61% | 0.32% |
 STSingapore Telecommunications Ltd | 0.26% | 0.64% | 0.26% |
 669Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. | 0.20% | 1.16% | 0.20% |
 MSILMaruti Suzuki India Ltd | 0.17% | 0.64% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do AAXJ and CGXU overlap?
AAXJ and CGXU overlap by 18.7% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (AAXJ holds 916 positions and CGXU holds 72), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both AAXJ and CGXU?
The two portfolios are 18.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of AAXJ and CGXU?
The largest positions held by both funds are TSMWF, 000660, 005930, 700 and 1299. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does AAXJ own that CGXU doesn't?
903 positions (64.1% of AAXJ) are unique to AAXJ, led by 9988, 2308 and 2454. In the other direction, 59 positions (73.3% of CGXU) are unique to CGXU.