AAXJ vs CQQQ: Holdings Overlap
AAXJiShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
iShares · 916 holdings · $3.8B · as of 2026-04-30
CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF
Invesco · 173 holdings · $3.2B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are AAXJ and CQQQ?
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF (AAXJ, by iShares) holds 916 positions; Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ, by Invesco) holds 173. They have 58 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 58AAXJ holds 916 · CQQQ holds 173
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- AAXJ 7%·CQQQ 78%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in AAXJ
858 of 916 positions (93.2% of the fund) are not held by CQQQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in CQQQ
115 of 173 positions (21.5% of the fund) are not held by AAXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | AAXJ | CQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 39.6% | 28.3% |
| Communication Services | 6.4% | 23.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.1% | 17.1% |
| Financials | 13.9% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 3.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 8.1% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 20.0% | 31.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (20% of AAXJ, 31% of CQQQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAXJ | -0.6% | +22.4% | +35.6% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +8.9% | 1.36% |
| CQQQ | -1.6% | +2.1% | +13.8% | +8.9% | -4.9% | +4.7% | 2.12% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in AAXJ vs CQQQ →
Shared Holdings(58)
The top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the overlap, led by 700, PDD and 3690.
3.70% | 8.41% | 3.70% | |
0.67% | 8.48% | 0.67% | |
0.51% | 8.59% | 0.51% | |
0.33% | 6.85% | 0.33% | |
0.14% | 4.28% | 0.14% | |
0.11% | 3.63% | 0.11% | |
0.07% | 2.58% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 2.59% | 0.07% | |
0.06% | 2.50% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 1.52% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 1.91% | 0.06% | |
0.05% | 2.20% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 1.58% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 2.98% | 0.05% | |
0.04% | 1.39% | 0.04% | |
0.03% | 1.10% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 1.03% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 1.03% | 0.03% | |
0.02% | 0.72% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.75% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.59% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.67% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.64% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.85% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.75% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do AAXJ and CQQQ overlap?
AAXJ and CQQQ overlap by 6.5% of portfolio weight. They share 58 holdings (AAXJ holds 916 positions and CQQQ holds 173), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both AAXJ and CQQQ?
The two portfolios are 6.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of AAXJ and CQQQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, PDD, 3690, 9888 and 1024. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the total overlap.
What does AAXJ own that CQQQ doesn't?
858 positions (93.2% of AAXJ) are unique to AAXJ, led by TSMWF, 005930 and 000660. In the other direction, 115 positions (21.5% of CQQQ) are unique to CQQQ.