ACWV vs BBCA: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
BBCAJPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
JPMorgan · 76 holdings · $10.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (ACWV: 2026-05-31, BBCA: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWV and BBCA?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA, by JPMorgan) holds 76. They have 7 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 7ACWV holds 412 · BBCA holds 76
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 2%·BBCA 10%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
405 of 412 positions (97.6% of the fund) are not held by BBCA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | BBCA |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 12.9% | 36.7% |
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 8.4% |
| Energy | 2.9% | 17.5% |
| Materials | 1.5% | 14.6% |
| Health Care | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 40.2% | 16.9% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 5.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 5% of BBCA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| BBCA | +5.0% | +14.6% | +30.6% | +22.7% | +12.8% | — | 1.68% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs BBCA →
Shared Holdings(7)
The top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by CSU, WCN and L.
0.57% | 1.26% | 0.57% | |
0.31% | 1.41% | 0.31% | |
0.31% | 0.86% | 0.31% | |
0.29% | 0.42% | 0.29% | |
0.10% | 1.40% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 1.14% | 0.09% | |
0.05% | 3.14% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and BBCA overlap?
ACWV and BBCA overlap by 1.7% of portfolio weight. They share 7 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and BBCA holds 76), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and BBCA?
The two portfolios are 1.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and BBCA?
The largest positions held by both funds are CSU, WCN, L, GIB and FNV. Together the top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that BBCA doesn't?
405 positions (97.6% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by CSCO, JNJ and TSMWF. In the other direction, 69 positions (89.7% of BBCA) are unique to BBCA.