ACWV vs VOO: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Vanguard · 504 holdings · $1.03T · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (ACWV: 2026-05-31, VOO: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWV and VOO?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; Vanguard 500 Index Fund (VOO, by Vanguard) holds 504. They have 137 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 23.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 23.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 137ACWV holds 412 · VOO holds 504
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 55%·VOO 50%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
275 of 412 positions (44.5% of the fund) are not held by VOO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 32.7% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 12.4% |
| Health Care | 12.5% | 9.5% |
| Communication Services | 11.5% | 10.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 4.4% | 9.9% |
| Other Sectors | 28.7% | 24.9% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 0% of VOO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| VOO | +3.4% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +21.3% | +13.4% | +15.4% | 1.03% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs VOO →
Shared Holdings(137)
The top 10 shared positions account for 32% of the overlap, led by MSFT, JNJ and BRK-B.
1.13% | 4.91% | 1.13% | |
1.41% | 1.05% | 1.05% | |
1.03% | 1.57% | 1.03% | |
0.89% | 1.27% | 0.89% | |
0.61% | 0.97% | 0.61% | |
0.78% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.55% | 0.89% | 0.55% | |
2.13% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.75% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.50% | 0.53% | 0.50% | |
0.44% | 0.79% | 0.44% | |
0.41% | 0.69% | 0.41% | |
0.41% | 7.58% | 0.41% | |
0.72% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.91% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.89% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.84% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.86% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.37% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.76% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.54% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.30% | 0.34% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 0.31% | 0.30% | |
0.44% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.27% | 2.40% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and VOO overlap?
ACWV and VOO overlap by 23.1% of portfolio weight. They share 137 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and VOO holds 504), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and VOO?
The two portfolios are 23.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and VOO?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, JNJ, BRK-B, XOM and WMT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 32% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that VOO doesn't?
275 positions (44.5% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by TSMWF, 2303 and 9433. In the other direction, 367 positions (49.5% of VOO) are unique to VOO.