ACWV vs BBJP: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (ACWV: 2026-05-31, BBJP: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWV and BBJP?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179. They have 37 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 37ACWV holds 412 · BBJP holds 179
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 10%·BBJP 14%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
375 of 412 positions (89.5% of the fund) are not held by BBJP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | BBJP |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 6.8% | 25.7% |
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 14.7% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 16.1% |
| Health Care | 12.5% | 5.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 4.4% | 12.3% |
| Other Sectors | 33.4% | 17.8% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 6.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 6% of BBJP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs BBJP →
Shared Holdings(37)
The top 10 shared positions account for 56% of the overlap, led by 9433, 9434 and 9432.
1.01% | 0.91% | 0.91% | |
0.82% | 0.77% | 0.77% | |
0.60% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.50% | 1.01% | 0.50% | |
0.59% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.44% | 1.66% | 0.44% | |
0.49% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.43% | 0.46% | 0.43% | |
0.43% | 0.67% | 0.43% | |
0.36% | 0.67% | 0.36% | |
0.36% | 0.44% | 0.36% | |
0.34% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.25% | 0.28% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 0.49% | 0.24% | |
0.26% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.22% | 0.30% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 0.33% | 0.21% | |
0.20% | 0.43% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.44% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.25% | 0.20% | |
0.18% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.15% | 0.17% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.16% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.28% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.29% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and BBJP overlap?
ACWV and BBJP overlap by 9.3% of portfolio weight. They share 37 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and BBJP holds 179), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and BBJP?
The two portfolios are 9.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and BBJP?
The largest positions held by both funds are 9433, 9434, 9432, 4502 and 6971. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 56% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that BBJP doesn't?
375 positions (89.5% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by CSCO, JNJ and TSMWF. In the other direction, 142 positions (84.6% of BBJP) are unique to BBJP.