ACWV vs CQQQ: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF
Invesco · 173 holdings · $3.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (ACWV: 2026-05-31, CQQQ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWV and CQQQ?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ, by Invesco) holds 173. They have 5 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 5ACWV holds 412 · CQQQ holds 173
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 1%·CQQQ 19%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
407 of 412 positions (98.6% of the fund) are not held by CQQQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | CQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 28.3% |
| Communication Services | 11.5% | 23.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 4.4% | 17.1% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 28.7% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 31.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 31% of CQQQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| CQQQ | -1.6% | +2.1% | +13.8% | +8.9% | -4.9% | +4.7% | 2.12% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs CQQQ →
Shared Holdings(5)
The top 5 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by 700, 688256 and 688041.
 700Tencent Holdings Ltd. | 0.23% | 8.41% | 0.23% |
|---|---|---|---|
 688256Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd. | 0.16% | 2.59% | 0.16% |
 688041Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd., A Shares | 0.13% | 2.50% | 0.13% |
 1347Hua Hong Semiconductor Ltd. | 0.11% | 3.63% | 0.11% |
 002371NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd., A Shares | 0.09% | 1.39% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and CQQQ overlap?
ACWV and CQQQ overlap by 0.7% of portfolio weight. They share 5 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and CQQQ holds 173), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and CQQQ?
The two portfolios are 0.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and CQQQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, 688256, 688041, 1347 and 002371. Together the top 5 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that CQQQ doesn't?
407 positions (98.6% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by CSCO, JNJ and TSMWF. In the other direction, 168 positions (81.4% of CQQQ) are unique to CQQQ.