ACWV vs EFG: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
iShares · 383 holdings · $17.1B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (ACWV: 2026-05-31, EFG: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWV and EFG?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG, by iShares) holds 383. They have 61 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 61ACWV holds 412 · EFG holds 383
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 9%·EFG 17%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
351 of 412 positions (90.2% of the fund) are not held by EFG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | EFG |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 6.8% | 28.8% |
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 16.1% |
| Health Care | 12.5% | 13.3% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 10.6% |
| Communication Services | 11.5% | 4.1% |
| Other Sectors | 26.3% | 20.3% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 6.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 6% of EFG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| EFG | +3.0% | +11.7% | +17.6% | +12.3% | +4.5% | +8.2% | 2.21% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs EFG →
Shared Holdings(61)
The top 10 shared positions account for 55% of the overlap, led by NOVN, 6861 and ARGXB.
0.87% | 2.73% | 0.87% | |
0.44% | 0.87% | 0.44% | |
0.41% | 0.47% | 0.41% | |
0.53% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.43% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.27% | 0.58% | 0.27% | |
0.25% | 1.70% | 0.25% | |
0.36% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.36% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.43% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.28% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.22% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.22% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 0.15% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 5.46% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.34% | 0.12% | |
0.36% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.18% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.12% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.26% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.21% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.12% | 0.09% | |
0.18% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and EFG overlap?
ACWV and EFG overlap by 6.6% of portfolio weight. They share 61 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and EFG holds 383), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and EFG?
The two portfolios are 6.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and EFG?
The largest positions held by both funds are NOVN, 6861, ARGXB, DTE and 4578. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 55% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that EFG doesn't?
351 positions (90.2% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by CSCO, JNJ and TSMWF. In the other direction, 322 positions (82.1% of EFG) are unique to EFG.