ACWV vs EZU: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 226 holdings · $9.8B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are ACWV and EZU?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU, by iShares) holds 226. They have 23 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 23ACWV holds 412 · EZU holds 226
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 5%·EZU 20%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
389 of 412 positions (94.8% of the fund) are not held by EZU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | EZU |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 15.4% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 23.5% |
| Industrials | 6.8% | 19.2% |
| Health Care | 12.5% | 5.2% |
| Communication Services | 11.5% | 3.7% |
| Other Sectors | 26.3% | 27.4% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 5.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 5% of EZU).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| EZU | +4.0% | +13.7% | +23.6% | +19.3% | +10.3% | +10.8% | 2.57% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs EZU →
Shared Holdings(23)
The top 10 shared positions account for 80% of the overlap, led by DTE, ORA and ARGXB.
0.53% | 1.59% | 0.53% | |
0.83% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.41% | 0.67% | 0.41% | |
0.39% | 1.00% | 0.39% | |
0.28% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.42% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.25% | 2.43% | 0.25% | |
0.18% | 0.48% | 0.18% | |
0.14% | 0.33% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.19% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 8.09% | 0.12% | |
0.15% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.14% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.14% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 1.88% | 0.07% | |
0.11% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.05% | 0.21% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 0.32% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 0.59% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 0.06% | 0.05% | |
0.04% | 0.08% | 0.04% | |
| Euro | 0.01% | 0.50% | 0.01% |
| GREAT BRITISH POUND | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and EZU overlap?
ACWV and EZU overlap by 3.8% of portfolio weight. They share 23 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and EZU holds 226), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and EZU?
The two portfolios are 3.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and EZU?
The largest positions held by both funds are DTE, ORA, ARGXB, NOKIA and AENA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 80% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that EZU doesn't?
389 positions (94.8% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by CSCO, JNJ and TSMWF. In the other direction, 203 positions (80.0% of EZU) are unique to EZU.