ACWV vs IXN: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 137 holdings · $8.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (ACWV: 2026-05-31, IXN: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWV and IXN?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN, by iShares) holds 137. They have 65 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 14.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 14.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 65ACWV holds 412 · IXN holds 137
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 21%·IXN 62%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
347 of 412 positions (77.9% of the fund) are not held by IXN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IXN
72 of 137 positions (37.9% of the fund) are not held by ACWV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | IXN |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 99.1% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 11.5% | 0.6% |
| Consumer Staples | 9.6% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 23.5% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 0% of IXN).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| IXN | +3.7% | +34.3% | +47.4% | +33.2% | +19.9% | +24.0% | 0.78% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs IXN →
Shared Holdings(65)
The top 10 shared positions account for 52% of the overlap, led by CSCO, TSMWF and MSFT.
2.13% | 1.79% | 1.79% | |
1.22% | 4.60% | 1.22% | |
1.13% | 9.06% | 1.13% | |
0.72% | 1.32% | 0.72% | |
0.49% | 1.80% | 0.49% | |
0.44% | 0.90% | 0.44% | |
1.16% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.41% | 13.97% | 0.41% | |
0.44% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.48% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.35% | 0.75% | 0.35% | |
0.30% | 1.02% | 0.30% | |
0.42% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 0.64% | 0.30% | |
0.29% | 0.58% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 0.30% | 0.28% | |
0.39% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.25% | 1.01% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 0.71% | 0.24% | |
0.74% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 0.70% | 0.21% | |
0.36% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.57% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.18% | 0.62% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.36% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and IXN overlap?
ACWV and IXN overlap by 14.3% of portfolio weight. They share 65 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and IXN holds 137), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and IXN?
The two portfolios are 14.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and IXN?
The largest positions held by both funds are CSCO, TSMWF, MSFT, IBM and 000660. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 52% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that IXN doesn't?
347 positions (77.9% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by JNJ, DUK and SO. In the other direction, 72 positions (37.9% of IXN) are unique to IXN.