ACWV vs MCHI: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are ACWV and MCHI?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580. They have 49 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 49ACWV holds 412 · MCHI holds 580
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 7%·MCHI 36%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
363 of 412 positions (92.8% of the fund) are not held by MCHI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 7.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 4.4% | 21.1% |
| Communication Services | 11.5% | 17.2% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 14.8% |
| Health Care | 12.5% | 0.9% |
| Other Sectors | 28.7% | 9.2% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 28.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 29% of MCHI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs MCHI →
Shared Holdings(49)
The top 10 shared positions account for 49% of the overlap, led by W8V, C6T and ICK.
0.73% | 1.80% | 0.73% | |
0.39% | 3.97% | 0.39% | |
0.30% | 2.10% | 0.30% | |
0.29% | 1.12% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 0.77% | 0.28% | |
0.27% | 0.49% | 0.27% | |
0.26% | 0.56% | 0.26% | |
0.23% | 13.21% | 0.23% | |
0.23% | 0.48% | 0.23% | |
0.20% | 0.74% | 0.20% | |
0.18% | 0.45% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 0.31% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.29% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.28% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.64% | 0.15% | |
0.13% | 0.24% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 0.23% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.74% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.22% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.21% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 2.35% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.58% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.22% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.18% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.41% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and MCHI overlap?
ACWV and MCHI overlap by 6.5% of portfolio weight. They share 49 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and MCHI holds 580), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and MCHI?
The two portfolios are 6.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and MCHI?
The largest positions held by both funds are W8V, C6T, ICK, PC6 and EK7. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 49% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that MCHI doesn't?
363 positions (92.8% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by CSCO, JNJ and TSMWF. In the other direction, 531 positions (63.5% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI.