ACWX vs IXN: Holdings Overlap
ACWXiShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
iShares · 1761 holdings · $11.7B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 137 holdings · $8.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (ACWX: 2026-04-30, IXN: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWX and IXN?
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX, by iShares) holds 1761 positions; iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN, by iShares) holds 137. They have 60 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 15.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 15.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 60ACWX holds 1761 · IXN holds 137
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWX 16%·IXN 23%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWX
1701 of 1761 positions (84.1% of the fund) are not held by IXN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWX | IXN |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 17.5% | 99.1% |
| Financials | 21.6% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.5% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 6.1% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 23.9% | 0.7% |
| Unclassified | 11.4% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (11% of ACWX, 0% of IXN).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWX | +3.0% | +16.6% | +28.7% | +19.1% | +9.3% | +9.6% | 2.46% |
| IXN | +3.7% | +34.3% | +47.4% | +33.2% | +19.9% | +24.0% | 0.78% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWX vs IXN →
Shared Holdings(60)
The top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the overlap, led by TSMWF, 005930 and ASML.
4.67% | 4.60% | 4.60% | |
1.95% | 3.39% | 1.95% | |
1.54% | 3.01% | 1.54% | |
1.33% | 1.80% | 1.33% | |
0.48% | 1.01% | 0.48% | |
0.40% | 0.85% | 0.40% | |
0.39% | 0.59% | 0.39% | |
0.37% | 0.51% | 0.37% | |
0.36% | 0.68% | 0.36% | |
0.35% | 0.45% | 0.35% | |
0.25% | 0.43% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 0.38% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.41% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.34% | 0.24% | |
0.18% | 0.42% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.25% | 0.18% | |
0.15% | 0.24% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.23% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.19% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 0.20% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.22% | 0.12% | |
0.10% | 0.16% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.13% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.20% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.21% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWX and IXN overlap?
ACWX and IXN overlap by 15.5% of portfolio weight. They share 60 holdings (ACWX holds 1761 positions and IXN holds 137), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWX and IXN?
The two portfolios are 15.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWX and IXN?
The largest positions held by both funds are TSMWF, 005930, ASML, 000660 and SAP. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the total overlap.
What does ACWX own that IXN doesn't?
1701 positions (84.1% of ACWX) are unique to ACWX, led by 700, HSBA and AZN. In the other direction, 77 positions (76.5% of IXN) are unique to IXN.