BBJP vs FNDC: Holdings Overlap
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
FNDCSchwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Schwab · 1580 holdings · $3.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (BBJP: 2026-04-30, FNDC: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BBJP and FNDC?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179 positions; Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC, by Schwab) holds 1580. They have 28 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 28BBJP holds 179 · FNDC holds 1580
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BBJP 5%·FNDC 3%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BBJP
151 of 179 positions (94.3% of the fund) are not held by FNDC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in FNDC
1552 of 1580 positions (96.2% of the fund) are not held by BBJP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
| FNDC | +4.3% | +15.1% | +22.5% | +18.2% | +8.5% | +9.0% | 3.53% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BBJP vs FNDC →
Shared Holdings(28)
The top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the overlap, led by 4062, 7735 and 7186.
0.44% | 0.69% | 0.44% | |
0.25% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.21% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.39% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.19% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.24% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.13% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.13% | 0.12% | |
0.21% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.30% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.08% | 0.10% | 0.08% | |
0.13% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.44% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.13% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.10% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.10% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.10% | 0.07% | |
0.10% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 0.08% | 0.06% | |
0.23% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.08% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.10% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.17% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.14% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BBJP and FNDC overlap?
BBJP and FNDC overlap by 2.6% of portfolio weight. They share 28 holdings (BBJP holds 179 positions and FNDC holds 1580), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BBJP and FNDC?
The two portfolios are 2.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of BBJP and FNDC?
The largest positions held by both funds are 4062, 7735, 7186, 7936 and 8331. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the total overlap.
What does BBJP own that FNDC doesn't?
151 positions (94.3% of BBJP) are unique to BBJP, led by 7203, 8306 and 6501. In the other direction, 1552 positions (96.2% of FNDC) are unique to FNDC.