BIZD vs MTUM: Holdings Overlap
VanEck · 30 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-03-31
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 125 holdings · $26.3B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (BIZD: 2026-03-31, MTUM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are BIZD and MTUM?
VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD, by VanEck) holds 30 positions; iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM, by iShares) holds 125. They have 0 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 0BIZD holds 30 · MTUM holds 125
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- BIZD 0%·MTUM 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in BIZD
30 of 30 positions (58.4% of the fund) are not held by MTUM.
- Ares Capital Corp13.00%
- Blue Owl Capital Corp7.81%
- Main Street Capital Corp6.69%
- Golub Capital BDC Inc2.86%
- Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp2.78%
- Blackstone Secured Lending Fund2.69%
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | BIZD | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 45.4% | 10.3% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 44.3% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 15.6% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 7.4% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 6.9% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 15.4% |
| Unclassified | 13.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (22% of BIZD, 0% of MTUM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIZD | +8.4% | +0.2% | -5.3% | +5.5% | +6.1% | +7.9% | 11.36% |
| MTUM | -1.0% | +23.8% | +27.7% | +29.4% | +12.8% | +16.1% | 0.60% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in BIZD vs MTUM →
Shared Holdings(0)
These two funds have no holdings in common.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do BIZD and MTUM overlap?
BIZD and MTUM overlap by 0.0% of portfolio weight. They share 0 holdings (BIZD holds 30 positions and MTUM holds 125), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both BIZD and MTUM?
The two portfolios are 0.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What does BIZD own that MTUM doesn't?
30 positions (58.4% of BIZD) are unique to BIZD, led by Ares Capital Corp, Blue Owl Capital Corp and Main Street Capital Corp. In the other direction, 125 positions (99.8% of MTUM) are unique to MTUM.