CALF vs FELG: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
FELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Fidelity · 100 holdings · $5.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, FELG: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and FELG?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG, by Fidelity) holds 100. They have 12 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 12CALF holds 200 · FELG holds 100
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 15%·FELG 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
188 of 200 positions (84.9% of the fund) are not held by FELG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | FELG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 51.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 11.4% |
| Communication Services | 9.5% | 12.6% |
| Energy | 9.6% | 0.8% |
| Health Care | 9.1% | 8.1% |
| Other Sectors | 16.3% | 15.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 0% of FELG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| FELG | +3.4% | +7.3% | +16.4% | — | — | — | 0.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs FELG →
Shared Holdings(12)
The top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the overlap, led by EXPE, ZM and LYFT.
2.00% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
2.41% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
1.29% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
1.07% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
1.10% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
1.55% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
2.05% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.84% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.29% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.46% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.14% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.88% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and FELG overlap?
CALF and FELG overlap by 4.3% of portfolio weight. They share 12 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and FELG holds 100), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and FELG?
The two portfolios are 4.3% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and FELG?
The largest positions held by both funds are EXPE, ZM, LYFT, EXEL and DOCU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that FELG doesn't?
188 positions (84.9% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by SNX, APA and DVN. In the other direction, 88 positions (95.0% of FELG) are unique to FELG.