CALF vs IGV: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, IGV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and IGV?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21CALF holds 200 · IGV holds 112
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 11%·IGV 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
179 of 200 positions (88.6% of the fund) are not held by IGV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | IGV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 90.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 0.2% |
| Energy | 9.6% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 9.5% | 8.2% |
| Health Care | 9.1% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 16.3% | 0.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 0% of IGV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs IGV →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the overlap, led by ZM, GEN and NTNX.
 ZMZoom Communications, Inc. | 2.41% | 0.91% | 0.91% |
|---|---|---|---|
 GENGen Digital, Inc. | 1.61% | 0.44% | 0.44% |
 NTNXNutanix, Inc., Class A | 0.92% | 0.44% | 0.44% |
 DOCUDocuSign, Inc. | 1.10% | 0.41% | 0.41% |
 DBXDropbox, Inc., Class A | 0.97% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
 DLBDolby Laboratories, Inc., Class A | 0.46% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
 BOXBox, Inc., Class A | 0.35% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
 BILLBILL Holdings, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
 QLYSQualys, Inc. | 0.30% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
 GTLBGitlab, Inc., Class A | 0.27% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
 RNGRingCentral, Inc., Class A | 0.63% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 TDCTeradata Corp. | 0.32% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
 TENBTenable Holdings, Inc. | 0.29% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
 RAMPLiveRamp Holdings, Inc. | 0.20% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
 FRSHFreshworks, Inc., Class A | 0.25% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
 BLKBBlackbaud, Inc. | 0.20% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
 FIVNFive9, Inc. | 0.20% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 PRGSProgress Software Corp. | 0.21% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 CXMSprinklr, Inc., Class A | 0.12% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 PDPagerDuty, Inc. | 0.11% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
 RPDRapid7, Inc. | 0.08% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and IGV overlap?
CALF and IGV overlap by 3.8% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and IGV holds 112), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and IGV?
The two portfolios are 3.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and IGV?
The largest positions held by both funds are ZM, GEN, NTNX, DOCU and DBX. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that IGV doesn't?
179 positions (88.6% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by SNX, APA and NTAP. In the other direction, 91 positions (96.2% of IGV) are unique to IGV.