CALF vs IJJ: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
IJJiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
iShares · 301 holdings · $9.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, IJJ: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and IJJ?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ, by iShares) holds 301. They have 34 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 8.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 8.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 34CALF holds 200 · IJJ holds 301
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 25%·IJJ 9%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
166 of 200 positions (74.6% of the fund) are not held by IJJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | IJJ |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 12.4% |
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 7.0% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 22.4% |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 19.0% |
| Energy | 9.6% | 7.6% |
| Other Sectors | 26.0% | 30.7% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 0% of IJJ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| IJJ | +3.0% | +15.1% | +23.8% | +12.8% | +9.2% | +10.5% | 1.56% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs IJJ →
Shared Holdings(34)
The top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the overlap, led by TOL, SNX and BWA.
1.71% | 0.82% | 0.82% | |
2.35% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
1.51% | 0.72% | 0.72% | |
0.68% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.93% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
1.14% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
1.10% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
| Taylor Morrison Home Corp. | 0.94% | 0.36% | 0.36% |
1.04% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.92% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.54% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.10% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.92% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.84% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.75% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.81% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.57% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.92% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.39% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.46% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.98% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.64% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.46% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.62% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.25% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and IJJ overlap?
CALF and IJJ overlap by 8.6% of portfolio weight. They share 34 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and IJJ holds 301), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and IJJ?
The two portfolios are 8.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and IJJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are TOL, SNX, BWA, GME and CHRD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that IJJ doesn't?
166 positions (74.6% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, APA and NTAP. In the other direction, 267 positions (90.5% of IJJ) are unique to IJJ.