CALF vs IJK: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
IJKiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
iShares · 242 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, IJK: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and IJK?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK, by iShares) holds 242. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21CALF holds 200 · IJK holds 242
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 14%·IJK 5%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
179 of 200 positions (85.8% of the fund) are not held by IJK. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | IJK |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 8.9% | 31.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 10.2% |
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 17.3% |
| Health Care | 9.1% | 14.4% |
| Energy | 9.6% | 3.3% |
| Other Sectors | 16.9% | 23.2% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 0% of IJK).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| IJK | +3.1% | +21.4% | +27.9% | +15.9% | +8.4% | +11.3% | 0.52% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs IJK →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the overlap, led by JAZZ, EXEL and NTNX.
1.53% | 0.70% | 0.70% | |
1.07% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
0.92% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.10% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.64% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.92% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.84% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.97% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.30% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.35% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.75% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.46% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.62% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.57% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.98% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.46% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.36% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.46% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.35% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.30% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.20% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and IJK overlap?
CALF and IJK overlap by 4.8% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and IJK holds 242), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and IJK?
The two portfolios are 4.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and IJK?
The largest positions held by both funds are JAZZ, EXEL, NTNX, DOCU and NEU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that IJK doesn't?
179 positions (85.8% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, SNX and APA. In the other direction, 221 positions (95.1% of IJK) are unique to IJK.