CALF vs IJR: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
IJRiShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 605 holdings · $113.4B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, IJR: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and IJR?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR, by iShares) holds 605. They have 88 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 88CALF holds 200 · IJR holds 605
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 34%·IJR 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
112 of 200 positions (66.4% of the fund) are not held by IJR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | IJR |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 13.2% |
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 12.7% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 17.4% |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 17.1% |
| Health Care | 9.1% | 11.1% |
| Other Sectors | 26.5% | 26.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 1% of IJR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| IJR | +2.4% | +24.5% | +36.4% | +14.5% | +7.7% | +10.9% | 1.10% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs IJR →
Shared Holdings(88)
The top 10 shared positions account for 29% of the overlap, led by MTCH, QRVO and KMX.
1.41% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.81% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.32% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.66% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.68% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
1.34% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.29% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.72% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.90% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
1.08% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.40% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.78% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.46% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.47% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.48% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.56% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.53% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.81% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.73% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.35% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.88% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.36% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.75% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
| Catalyst Pharmaceuticals Inc. COM | 0.29% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
0.63% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and IJR overlap?
CALF and IJR overlap by 12.7% of portfolio weight. They share 88 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and IJR holds 605), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and IJR?
The two portfolios are 12.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and IJR?
The largest positions held by both funds are MTCH, QRVO, KMX, ALKS and CRC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 29% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that IJR doesn't?
112 positions (66.4% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, SNX and APA. In the other direction, 517 positions (85.7% of IJR) are unique to IJR.