CALF vs IJS: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
IJSiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
iShares · 458 holdings · $8.4B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, IJS: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and IJS?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (IJS, by iShares) holds 458. They have 66 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 66CALF holds 200 · IJS holds 458
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 25%·IJS 14%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
134 of 200 positions (75.0% of the fund) are not held by IJS. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | IJS |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 15.4% |
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 9.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 20.6% |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 12.4% |
| Energy | 9.6% | 8.6% |
| Other Sectors | 26.0% | 30.7% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 1% of IJS).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| IJS | +3.6% | +23.1% | +39.5% | +13.6% | +8.2% | +10.2% | 1.29% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs IJS →
Shared Holdings(66)
The top 10 shared positions account for 43% of the overlap, led by MTCH, KMX and VSNT.
1.41% | 0.93% | 0.93% | |
1.32% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
1.34% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
0.68% | 0.70% | 0.68% | |
0.72% | 0.66% | 0.66% | |
0.78% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.73% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.75% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.36% | 0.42% | 0.36% | |
0.36% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.81% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.39% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.88% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.45% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.29% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.08% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.38% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.53% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.49% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.40% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.21% | 0.19% | |
0.36% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.20% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.36% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.24% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and IJS overlap?
CALF and IJS overlap by 13.5% of portfolio weight. They share 66 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and IJS holds 458), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and IJS?
The two portfolios are 13.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and IJS?
The largest positions held by both funds are MTCH, KMX, VSNT, CRC and MHK. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 43% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that IJS doesn't?
134 positions (75.0% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, SNX and APA. In the other direction, 392 positions (84.8% of IJS) are unique to IJS.