CALF vs IJT: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
IJTiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
iShares · 341 holdings · $8.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, IJT: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and IJT?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT, by iShares) holds 341. They have 48 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 11.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 11.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 48CALF holds 200 · IJT holds 341
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 19%·IJT 12%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
152 of 200 positions (81.1% of the fund) are not held by IJT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | IJT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 10.8% |
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 15.7% |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 22.0% |
| Health Care | 9.1% | 15.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 14.3% |
| Other Sectors | 26.5% | 20.3% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 1.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 1% of IJT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| IJT | +1.2% | +25.8% | +33.4% | +15.2% | +6.7% | +11.1% | 0.68% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs IJT →
Shared Holdings(48)
The top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the overlap, led by LYFT, ALKS and ETSY.
1.29% | 0.70% | 0.70% | |
0.66% | 0.77% | 0.66% | |
0.90% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
0.81% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.56% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.48% | 0.51% | 0.48% | |
0.81% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.47% | 0.51% | 0.47% | |
0.46% | 0.53% | 0.46% | |
0.40% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.08% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.35% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
| Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0.29% | 0.38% | 0.29% |
0.53% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.33% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.63% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.20% | 0.22% | 0.20% | |
0.49% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.37% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.21% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.36% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.19% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.32% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.23% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.23% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and IJT overlap?
CALF and IJT overlap by 11.3% of portfolio weight. They share 48 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and IJT holds 341), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and IJT?
The two portfolios are 11.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and IJT?
The largest positions held by both funds are LYFT, ALKS, ETSY, QRVO and AZZ. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that IJT doesn't?
152 positions (81.1% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, SNX and APA. In the other direction, 293 positions (87.7% of IJT) are unique to IJT.