CALF vs ITB: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
ITBiShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
iShares · 46 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, ITB: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and ITB?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB, by iShares) holds 46. They have 8 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 8CALF holds 200 · ITB holds 46
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 4%·ITB 10%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
192 of 200 positions (95.8% of the fund) are not held by ITB. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | ITB |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 73.0% |
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 20.8% |
| Energy | 9.6% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 9.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 16.6% | 6.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 0% of ITB).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| ITB | +1.3% | +5.4% | -1.5% | +5.3% | +8.1% | +14.1% | 0.64% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs ITB →
Shared Holdings(8)
The top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by TOL, Taylor Morrison Home Corp COM and MHK.
 TOLToll Brothers, Inc. COM | 1.71% | 5.25% | 1.71% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Morrison Home Corp COM | 0.94% | 2.31% | 0.94% |
 MHKMohawk Industries, Inc. COM | 0.72% | 1.14% | 0.72% |
 LEGLeggett & Platt Inc. COM | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.30% |
 LZBLa-Z-Boy Inc COM | 0.18% | 0.30% | 0.18% |
 ROCKGibraltar Industries, Inc. COM | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.13% |
 HOVHovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Class A | 0.12% | 0.21% | 0.12% |
 ETDEthan Allen Interiors Inc. COM | 0.04% | 0.11% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and ITB overlap?
CALF and ITB overlap by 4.2% of portfolio weight. They share 8 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and ITB holds 46), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and ITB?
The two portfolios are 4.2% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and ITB?
The largest positions held by both funds are TOL, Taylor Morrison Home Corp COM, MHK, LEG and LZB. Together the top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that ITB doesn't?
192 positions (95.8% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, SNX and APA. In the other direction, 38 positions (89.9% of ITB) are unique to ITB.