CALF vs SCHA: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
Schwab · 1705 holdings · $23.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, SCHA: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and SCHA?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA, by Schwab) holds 1705. They have 155 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 155CALF holds 200 · SCHA holds 1705
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 51%·SCHA 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
45 of 200 positions (48.9% of the fund) are not held by SCHA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | SCHA |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 9.3% |
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 22.1% |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 17.7% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 15.1% |
| Health Care | 9.1% | 13.4% |
| Other Sectors | 26.5% | 21.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 1% of SCHA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| SCHA | +1.0% | +22.8% | +36.7% | +17.1% | +7.9% | +10.8% | 1.02% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs SCHA →
Shared Holdings(155)
The top 10 shared positions account for 20% of the overlap, led by CRUS, CHRD and NOV.
0.84% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.93% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
1.10% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.66% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
1.34% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.64% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.98% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
1.04% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
| Taylor Morrison Home Corp | 0.94% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
1.29% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.57% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.62% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.78% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.97% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.68% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.54% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.48% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.27% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.08% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.46% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.56% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.30% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.35% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.40% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.81% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and SCHA overlap?
CALF and SCHA overlap by 7.0% of portfolio weight. They share 155 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and SCHA holds 1705), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and SCHA?
The two portfolios are 7.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and SCHA?
The largest positions held by both funds are CRUS, CHRD, NOV, ALKS and VSNT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 20% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that SCHA doesn't?
45 positions (48.9% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, SNX and APA. In the other direction, 1550 positions (92.8% of SCHA) are unique to SCHA.