CALF vs SKYY: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
SKYYFirst Trust Cloud Computing ETF
First Trust · 62 holdings · $3.1B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, SKYY: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and SKYY?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (SKYY, by First Trust) holds 62. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11CALF holds 200 · SKYY holds 62
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 9%·SKYY 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
189 of 200 positions (90.6% of the fund) are not held by SKYY. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in SKYY
51 of 62 positions (86.9% of the fund) are not held by CALF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | SKYY |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 82.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 3.7% |
| Energy | 9.6% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 9.5% | 8.7% |
| Health Care | 9.1% | 0.6% |
| Other Sectors | 16.3% | 1.2% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 3.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 3% of SKYY).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| SKYY | +12.3% | +20.1% | +27.6% | +25.7% | +8.0% | +17.1% | — |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs SKYY →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by NTAP, NTNX and ZM.
 NTAPNetApp Inc. COM | 2.05% | 1.92% | 1.92% |
|---|---|---|---|
 NTNXNutanix Inc CL A | 0.92% | 3.69% | 0.92% |
 ZMZoom Communications Inc. CL A | 2.41% | 0.67% | 0.67% |
 DOCUDocusign Inc COM | 1.10% | 0.65% | 0.65% |
 RNGRingcentral Inc CL A | 0.63% | 1.51% | 0.63% |
 DBXDropbox Inc CL A | 0.97% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
 BOXBox Inc. CL A | 0.35% | 0.62% | 0.35% |
 QLYSQualys Inc COM | 0.30% | 0.59% | 0.30% |
 GTLBGitlab Inc CLASS A COM | 0.27% | 1.53% | 0.27% |
 FIVNFive9 Inc. COM | 0.20% | 0.80% | 0.20% |
 BLKBBlackbaud Inc COM | 0.20% | 0.49% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and SKYY overlap?
CALF and SKYY overlap by 6.7% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and SKYY holds 62), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and SKYY?
The two portfolios are 6.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and SKYY?
The largest positions held by both funds are NTAP, NTNX, ZM, DOCU and RNG. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that SKYY doesn't?
189 positions (90.6% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by SNX, APA and DVN. In the other direction, 51 positions (86.9% of SKYY) are unique to SKYY.