CALF vs SLYV: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
SLYVState Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Value ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 462 holdings · $5.1B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, SLYV: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and SLYV?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 462. They have 72 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 14.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 14.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 72CALF holds 200 · SLYV holds 462
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 28%·SLYV 15%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
128 of 200 positions (71.7% of the fund) are not held by SLYV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in SLYV
390 of 462 positions (85.1% of the fund) are not held by CALF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | SLYV |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 15.7% |
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 11.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 22.1% |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 13.2% |
| Energy | 9.6% | 6.6% |
| Other Sectors | 26.0% | 29.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 1.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 1% of SLYV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| SLYV | +3.6% | +23.2% | +39.5% | +13.6% | +8.2% | +10.3% | 1.78% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs SLYV →
Shared Holdings(72)
The top 10 shared positions account for 40% of the overlap, led by MTCH, KMX and MHK.
1.41% | 0.92% | 0.92% | |
1.32% | 0.88% | 0.88% | |
0.72% | 0.73% | 0.72% | |
1.34% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.78% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.58% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.68% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.73% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.36% | 0.44% | 0.36% | |
0.36% | 0.46% | 0.36% | |
0.88% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.39% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.81% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.75% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.29% | 0.48% | 0.29% | |
0.36% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.38% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.25% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.63% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.53% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.49% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.08% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.45% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.20% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and SLYV overlap?
CALF and SLYV overlap by 14.4% of portfolio weight. They share 72 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and SLYV holds 462), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and SLYV?
The two portfolios are 14.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and SLYV?
The largest positions held by both funds are MTCH, KMX, MHK, VSNT and RUSHA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 40% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that SLYV doesn't?
128 positions (71.7% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, SNX and APA. In the other direction, 390 positions (85.1% of SLYV) are unique to SLYV.