CALF vs VB: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
VBVanguard Small-cap Index Fund
Vanguard · 1312 holdings · $82.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, VB: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and VB?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; Vanguard Small-cap Index Fund (VB, by Vanguard) holds 1312. They have 141 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 141CALF holds 200 · VB holds 1312
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 79%·VB 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
59 of 200 positions (20.6% of the fund) are not held by VB. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 10.5% |
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 13.8% |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 21.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 13.4% |
| Health Care | 9.1% | 11.6% |
| Other Sectors | 26.5% | 28.5% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 1% of VB).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| VB | +2.5% | +19.5% | +29.1% | +15.9% | +8.1% | +11.3% | 1.18% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs VB →
Shared Holdings(141)
The top 10 shared positions account for 27% of the overlap, led by OMC, INCY and APA.
1.81% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.55% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
2.17% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.07% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.71% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.66% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
2.35% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
1.51% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
1.53% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
1.19% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
1.07% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.92% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
1.61% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
1.10% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.68% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.93% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.56% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.84% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.41% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.58% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.81% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.75% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.14% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.32% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and VB overlap?
CALF and VB overlap by 7.3% of portfolio weight. They share 141 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and VB holds 1312), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and VB?
The two portfolios are 7.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and VB?
The largest positions held by both funds are OMC, INCY, APA, DECK and TOL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 27% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that VB doesn't?
59 positions (20.6% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, NTAP and DVN. In the other direction, 1171 positions (92.4% of VB) are unique to VB.