CALF vs VIOV: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
VIOVVanguard S&P Small-cap 600 Value Index Fund
Vanguard · 460 holdings · $1.9B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, VIOV: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and VIOV?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; Vanguard S&P Small-cap 600 Value Index Fund (VIOV, by Vanguard) holds 460. They have 69 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 69CALF holds 200 · VIOV holds 460
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 26%·VIOV 14%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
131 of 200 positions (73.9% of the fund) are not held by VIOV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | VIOV |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 14.9% |
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 13.3% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 21.0% |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 12.6% |
| Energy | 9.6% | 7.3% |
| Other Sectors | 26.0% | 30.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 0% of VIOV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| VIOV | +3.7% | +23.2% | +39.7% | +13.8% | +8.4% | +10.4% | 1.64% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs VIOV →
Shared Holdings(69)
The top 10 shared positions account for 42% of the overlap, led by MTCH, KMX and VSNT.
1.41% | 0.99% | 0.99% | |
1.32% | 0.74% | 0.74% | |
1.34% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
0.72% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
0.68% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
0.78% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.73% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.81% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.36% | 0.43% | 0.36% | |
0.36% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.75% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.88% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.29% | 0.38% | 0.29% | |
0.39% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.08% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.38% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.53% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.45% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.37% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.36% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.25% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.18% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.20% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.49% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and VIOV overlap?
CALF and VIOV overlap by 13.5% of portfolio weight. They share 69 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and VIOV holds 460), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and VIOV?
The two portfolios are 13.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and VIOV?
The largest positions held by both funds are MTCH, KMX, VSNT, MHK and CRC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 42% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that VIOV doesn't?
131 positions (73.9% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, SNX and APA. In the other direction, 391 positions (85.7% of VIOV) are unique to VIOV.