CALF vs XMHQ: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
XMHQInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Invesco · 80 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are CALF and XMHQ?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ, by Invesco) holds 80. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13CALF holds 200 · XMHQ holds 80
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 7%·XMHQ 9%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
187 of 200 positions (92.7% of the fund) are not held by XMHQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | XMHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 8.9% | 28.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 9.5% |
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 8.4% |
| Health Care | 9.1% | 19.7% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 15.1% |
| Other Sectors | 26.5% | 18.8% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 0% of XMHQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| XMHQ | +4.3% | +16.0% | +18.7% | +14.6% | +10.6% | +13.0% | 0.55% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs XMHQ →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the overlap, led by EXEL, ALV and CRUS.
 EXELExelixis, Inc. | 1.07% | 2.13% | 1.07% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ALVAutoliv, Inc. | 0.92% | 1.16% | 0.92% |
 CRUSCirrus Logic, Inc. | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.84% |
 GGenpact Ltd. | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
 GMEGameStop Corp., Class A | 0.68% | 1.24% | 0.68% |
 CBTCabot Corp. | 0.54% | 0.47% | 0.47% |
 DUOLDuolingo, Inc. | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.46% |
 ANFAbercrombie & Fitch Co., Class A | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.46% |
 VCVisteon Corp. | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.39% |
 DOCSDoximity, Inc., Class A | 0.35% | 0.50% | 0.35% |
 QLYSQualys, Inc. | 0.30% | 0.41% | 0.30% |
 SAMBoston Beer Co., Inc. (The), Class A | 0.25% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
 COLMColumbia Sportswear Co. | 0.27% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and XMHQ overlap?
CALF and XMHQ overlap by 7.1% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and XMHQ holds 80), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and XMHQ?
The two portfolios are 7.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and XMHQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are EXEL, ALV, CRUS, G and GME. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that XMHQ doesn't?
187 positions (92.7% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, SNX and APA. In the other direction, 67 positions (90.5% of XMHQ) are unique to XMHQ.