CGBL vs COWZ: Holdings Overlap
CGBLCapital Group Core Balanced ETF
Capital Group · 73 holdings · $7.5B · as of 2026-03-31
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CGBL: 2026-03-31, COWZ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGBL and COWZ?
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL, by Capital Group) holds 73 positions; Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100. They have 8 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 8CGBL holds 73 · COWZ holds 100
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGBL 5%·COWZ 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGBL
65 of 73 positions (92.8% of the fund) are not held by COWZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGBL | COWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 6.1% | 21.0% |
| Information Technology | 16.3% | 19.4% |
| Energy | 1.6% | 16.4% |
| Industrials | 10.2% | 11.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 5.8% | 9.8% |
| Other Sectors | 22.0% | 21.5% |
| Unclassified | 36.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (37% of CGBL, 0% of COWZ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | +2.1% | +9.5% | +16.6% | — | — | — | 1.83% |
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGBL vs COWZ →
Shared Holdings(8)
The top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by BKNG, GILD and CMCSA.
 BKNGBooking Holdings Inc | 1.11% | 1.87% | 1.11% |
|---|---|---|---|
 GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 1.08% | 1.83% | 1.08% |
 CMCSAComcast Corp | 0.85% | 1.71% | 0.85% |
 COPConocoPhillips | 0.57% | 2.17% | 0.57% |
 DHIDR Horton Inc | 0.52% | 1.21% | 0.52% |
 CVSCVS Health Corp | 0.38% | 2.16% | 0.38% |
 CRMSalesforce Inc | 0.35% | 1.76% | 0.35% |
 ILMNIllumina Inc | 0.41% | 0.31% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGBL and COWZ overlap?
CGBL and COWZ overlap by 5.2% of portfolio weight. They share 8 holdings (CGBL holds 73 positions and COWZ holds 100), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGBL and COWZ?
The two portfolios are 5.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGBL and COWZ?
The largest positions held by both funds are BKNG, GILD, CMCSA, COP and DHI. Together the top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CGBL own that COWZ doesn't?
65 positions (92.8% of CGBL) are unique to CGBL, led by CGCP, CGCB and AVGO. In the other direction, 92 positions (86.8% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ.