CGBL vs IMTM: Holdings Overlap
CGBLCapital Group Core Balanced ETF
Capital Group · 73 holdings · $7.5B · as of 2026-03-31
IMTMiShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 313 holdings · $4.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CGBL: 2026-03-31, IMTM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGBL and IMTM?
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL, by Capital Group) holds 73 positions; iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM, by iShares) holds 313. They have 5 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 5CGBL holds 73 · IMTM holds 313
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGBL 4%·IMTM 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGBL
68 of 73 positions (94.0% of the fund) are not held by IMTM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGBL | IMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 9.0% | 36.0% |
| Industrials | 10.2% | 20.2% |
| Information Technology | 16.3% | 10.0% |
| Materials | 4.9% | 8.4% |
| Health Care | 6.1% | 4.5% |
| Other Sectors | 15.4% | 15.6% |
| Unclassified | 36.1% | 4.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (37% of CGBL, 5% of IMTM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | +2.1% | +9.5% | +16.6% | — | — | — | 1.83% |
| IMTM | +2.7% | +12.9% | +21.7% | +21.3% | +10.1% | +10.4% | 4.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGBL vs IMTM →
Shared Holdings(5)
The top 5 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by WPM, SAF and FNV.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGBL and IMTM overlap?
CGBL and IMTM overlap by 1.8% of portfolio weight. They share 5 holdings (CGBL holds 73 positions and IMTM holds 313), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGBL and IMTM?
The two portfolios are 1.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGBL and IMTM?
The largest positions held by both funds are WPM, SAF, FNV, LUN and FM. Together the top 5 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CGBL own that IMTM doesn't?
68 positions (94.0% of CGBL) are unique to CGBL, led by CGCP, CGCB and AVGO. In the other direction, 308 positions (97.3% of IMTM) are unique to IMTM.