CGBL vs PAVE: Holdings Overlap
CGBLCapital Group Core Balanced ETF
Capital Group · 73 holdings · $7.5B · as of 2026-03-31
PAVEGlobal X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Global X · 100 holdings · $14.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGBL: 2026-03-31, PAVE: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGBL and PAVE?
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL, by Capital Group) holds 73 positions; Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE, by Global X) holds 100. They have 5 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 5CGBL holds 73 · PAVE holds 100
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGBL 4%·PAVE 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGBL
68 of 73 positions (93.8% of the fund) are not held by PAVE. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in PAVE
95 of 100 positions (87.3% of the fund) are not held by CGBL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGBL | PAVE |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 10.2% | 75.1% |
| Materials | 4.9% | 20.3% |
| Information Technology | 16.3% | 1.1% |
| Financials | 9.0% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 6.1% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 15.4% | 3.1% |
| Unclassified | 36.1% | 0.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (37% of CGBL, 0% of PAVE).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | +2.1% | +9.5% | +16.6% | — | — | — | 1.83% |
| PAVE | +4.0% | +23.0% | +29.9% | +22.7% | +18.1% | — | 0.73% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGBL vs PAVE →
Shared Holdings(5)
The top 5 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by ATI, UNP and DE.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGBL and PAVE overlap?
CGBL and PAVE overlap by 4.3% of portfolio weight. They share 5 holdings (CGBL holds 73 positions and PAVE holds 100), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGBL and PAVE?
The two portfolios are 4.3% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGBL and PAVE?
The largest positions held by both funds are ATI, UNP, DE, PH and URI. Together the top 5 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CGBL own that PAVE doesn't?
68 positions (93.8% of CGBL) are unique to CGBL, led by CGCP, CGCB and AVGO. In the other direction, 95 positions (87.3% of PAVE) are unique to PAVE.