CGCP vs MTUM: Holdings Overlap
CGCPCapital Group Core Plus Income ETF
Capital Group · 1430 holdings · $8.4B · as of 2026-03-31
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 125 holdings · $26.3B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CGCP: 2026-03-31, MTUM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGCP and MTUM?
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP, by Capital Group) holds 1430 positions; iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM, by iShares) holds 125. They have 0 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 0CGCP holds 1430 · MTUM holds 125
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGCP 0%·MTUM 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGCP
1430 of 1430 positions (100.1% of the fund) are not held by MTUM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
- U.S. Treasury Notes4.06%
- U.S. Treasury Bonds2.79%
- U.S. Treasury Notes2.15%
- U.S. Treasury Bonds2.08%
- U.S. Treasury Bonds1.98%
- U.S. Treasury Notes1.92%
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGCP | -0.2% | +0.1% | +2.7% | +5.1% | — | — | 5.13% |
| MTUM | -1.0% | +23.8% | +27.7% | +29.4% | +12.8% | +16.1% | 0.60% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGCP vs MTUM →
Shared Holdings(0)
These two funds have no holdings in common.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGCP and MTUM overlap?
CGCP and MTUM overlap by 0.0% of portfolio weight. They share 0 holdings (CGCP holds 1430 positions and MTUM holds 125), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGCP and MTUM?
The two portfolios are 0.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What does CGCP own that MTUM doesn't?
1430 positions (100.1% of CGCP) are unique to CGCP, led by U.S. Treasury Notes, U.S. Treasury Bonds and U.S. Treasury Notes. In the other direction, 125 positions (99.8% of MTUM) are unique to MTUM.