CGDV vs QQQI: Holdings Overlap
CGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETF
Capital Group · 52 holdings · $37.4B · as of 2026-05-31
QQQINEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
NEOS · 101 holdings · $13.9B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGDV: 2026-05-31, QQQI: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGDV and QQQI?
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV, by Capital Group) holds 52 positions; NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF (QQQI, by NEOS) holds 101. They have 19 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 35.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 35.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 19CGDV holds 52 · QQQI holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGDV 47%·QQQI 47%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGDV
33 of 52 positions (51.1% of the fund) are not held by QQQI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGDV | QQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 34.4% | 49.3% |
| Communication Services | 8.7% | 15.9% |
| Industrials | 13.0% | 4.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.9% | 12.5% |
| Health Care | 9.9% | 5.0% |
| Other Sectors | 24.1% | 12.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDV | +4.9% | +18.2% | +28.6% | +24.3% | — | — | 1.14% |
| QQQI | +1.3% | +11.3% | +20.0% | — | — | — | 13.81% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGDV vs QQQI →
Shared Holdings(19)
The top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MSFT and GOOGL.
 NVDANVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | 8.64% | 5.66% |
|---|---|---|---|
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.81% | 5.62% | 5.62% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.59% | 3.41% | 3.41% |
 METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 3.42% | 3.33% |
 AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.16% | 2.98% | 2.98% |
 AAPLApple Inc | 2.36% | 7.67% | 2.36% |
 AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 1.88% | 4.54% | 1.88% |
 CSCOCisco Systems Inc | 3.02% | 1.72% | 1.72% |
 AMATApplied Materials Inc | 3.12% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
 LINLinde PLC | 1.95% | 1.30% | 1.30% |
 INTCIntel Corp | 1.09% | 1.18% | 1.09% |
 TXNTexas Instruments Inc | 1.21% | 0.99% | 0.99% |
 AMGNAmgen Inc | 0.79% | 1.06% | 0.79% |
 VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0.80% | 0.63% | 0.63% |
 CMCSAComcast Corp | 1.75% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
 SBUXStarbucks Corp | 2.26% | 0.57% | 0.57% |
 STXSeagate Technology Holdings PLC | 1.42% | 0.47% | 0.47% |
 MDLZMondelez International Inc | 0.79% | 0.41% | 0.41% |
 FANGDiamondback Energy Inc | 0.81% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGDV and QQQI overlap?
CGDV and QQQI overlap by 35.6% of portfolio weight. They share 19 holdings (CGDV holds 52 positions and QQQI holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGDV and QQQI?
The two portfolios are 35.6% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGDV and QQQI?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MSFT, GOOGL, META and AVGO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the total overlap.
What does CGDV own that QQQI doesn't?
33 positions (51.1% of CGDV) are unique to CGDV, led by LLY, GE and RCL. In the other direction, 82 positions (52.0% of QQQI) are unique to QQQI.