CGDV vs QYLD: Holdings Overlap
CGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETF
Capital Group · 52 holdings · $37.4B · as of 2026-05-31
QYLDGlobal X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Global X · 101 holdings · $8.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGDV: 2026-05-31, QYLD: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGDV and QYLD?
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV, by Capital Group) holds 52 positions; Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD, by Global X) holds 101. They have 19 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 36.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 36.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 19CGDV holds 52 · QYLD holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGDV 47%·QYLD 50%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGDV
33 of 52 positions (51.1% of the fund) are not held by QYLD. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGDV | QYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 34.4% | 54.9% |
| Communication Services | 8.7% | 16.3% |
| Industrials | 13.0% | 3.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.9% | 12.6% |
| Health Care | 9.9% | 4.3% |
| Other Sectors | 24.1% | 11.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDV | +4.9% | +18.2% | +28.6% | +24.3% | — | — | 1.14% |
| QYLD | +1.4% | +10.1% | +21.5% | +13.4% | +8.2% | +9.7% | 11.64% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGDV vs QYLD →
Shared Holdings(19)
The top 10 shared positions account for 83% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MSFT and AVGO.
5.66% | 8.85% | 5.66% | |
5.81% | 5.53% | 5.53% | |
5.16% | 3.61% | 3.61% | |
3.59% | 4.09% | 3.59% | |
3.33% | 3.29% | 3.29% | |
2.36% | 7.27% | 2.36% | |
1.88% | 5.19% | 1.88% | |
3.02% | 1.82% | 1.82% | |
3.12% | 1.58% | 1.58% | |
1.21% | 1.28% | 1.21% | |
1.95% | 1.17% | 1.17% | |
1.09% | 2.38% | 1.09% | |
0.79% | 0.94% | 0.79% | |
1.42% | 0.74% | 0.74% | |
2.26% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.80% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
1.75% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.79% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.81% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGDV and QYLD overlap?
CGDV and QYLD overlap by 36.6% of portfolio weight. They share 19 holdings (CGDV holds 52 positions and QYLD holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGDV and QYLD?
The two portfolios are 36.6% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGDV and QYLD?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MSFT, AVGO, GOOGL and META. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 83% of the total overlap.
What does CGDV own that QYLD doesn't?
33 positions (51.1% of CGDV) are unique to CGDV, led by LLY, GE and RCL. In the other direction, 82 positions (53.4% of QYLD) are unique to QYLD.