CGGO vs EZU: Holdings Overlap
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Capital Group · 104 holdings · $11.5B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 226 holdings · $9.8B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are CGGO and EZU?
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO, by Capital Group) holds 104 positions; iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU, by iShares) holds 226. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21CGGO holds 104 · EZU holds 226
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGO 15%·EZU 27%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGO
83 of 104 positions (83.2% of the fund) are not held by EZU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGO | EZU |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 39.1% | 15.4% |
| Financials | 10.4% | 23.5% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 19.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.3% | 6.9% |
| Health Care | 8.0% | 5.2% |
| Other Sectors | 16.0% | 24.2% |
| Unclassified | 3.0% | 5.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of CGGO, 5% of EZU).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | -0.2% | +17.3% | +26.5% | +20.0% | — | — | 0.98% |
| EZU | +4.0% | +13.7% | +23.6% | +19.3% | +10.3% | +10.8% | 2.57% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGO vs EZU →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 79% of the overlap, led by ASML, SIE and BBVA.
2.34% | 8.09% | 2.34% | |
1.30% | 3.07% | 1.30% | |
1.02% | 1.72% | 1.02% | |
1.00% | 1.60% | 1.00% | |
0.78% | 1.63% | 0.78% | |
0.97% | 0.77% | 0.77% | |
0.94% | 0.74% | 0.74% | |
0.71% | 2.24% | 0.71% | |
0.56% | 1.24% | 0.56% | |
0.54% | 1.75% | 0.54% | |
0.42% | 0.87% | 0.42% | |
0.37% | 0.78% | 0.37% | |
0.53% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.98% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.25% | 0.54% | 0.25% | |
0.33% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.40% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.38% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.58% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.43% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
| CVC Capital Partners PLC | 0.23% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGO and EZU overlap?
CGGO and EZU overlap by 12.3% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (CGGO holds 104 positions and EZU holds 226), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGO and EZU?
The two portfolios are 12.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGO and EZU?
The largest positions held by both funds are ASML, SIE, BBVA, AIR and SAF. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 79% of the total overlap.
What does CGGO own that EZU doesn't?
83 positions (83.2% of CGGO) are unique to CGGO, led by TSM, MU and 000660. In the other direction, 205 positions (73.3% of EZU) are unique to EZU.