CGGO vs IVV: Holdings Overlap
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Capital Group · 104 holdings · $11.5B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 503 holdings · $901.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGGO: 2026-05-31, IVV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGGO and IVV?
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO, by Capital Group) holds 104 positions; iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV, by iShares) holds 503. They have 44 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 21.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 21.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 44CGGO holds 104 · IVV holds 503
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGO 47%·IVV 41%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGO
60 of 104 positions (51.3% of the fund) are not held by IVV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 39.1% | 32.6% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 9.0% |
| Financials | 10.4% | 12.6% |
| Communication Services | 6.7% | 10.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.3% | 9.8% |
| Other Sectors | 17.2% | 25.3% |
| Unclassified | 3.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of CGGO, 0% of IVV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | -0.2% | +17.3% | +26.5% | +20.0% | — | — | 0.98% |
| IVV | +3.4% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +21.3% | +13.4% | +15.4% | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGO vs IVV →
Shared Holdings(44)
The top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the overlap, led by GOOGL, AVGO and MSFT.
3.02% | 2.99% | 2.99% | |
3.70% | 2.62% | 2.62% | |
2.04% | 4.91% | 2.04% | |
1.39% | 7.56% | 1.39% | |
1.37% | 2.23% | 1.37% | |
0.89% | 1.30% | 0.89% | |
0.88% | 0.91% | 0.88% | |
0.75% | 6.65% | 0.75% | |
0.74% | 0.79% | 0.74% | |
0.73% | 3.63% | 0.73% | |
5.69% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
0.85% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.46% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
1.04% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.76% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.69% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.98% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.42% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.65% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.32% | 0.34% | 0.32% | |
0.52% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.92% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.65% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.14% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.81% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGO and IVV overlap?
CGGO and IVV overlap by 21.8% of portfolio weight. They share 44 holdings (CGGO holds 104 positions and IVV holds 503), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGO and IVV?
The two portfolios are 21.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGO and IVV?
The largest positions held by both funds are GOOGL, AVGO, MSFT, NVDA and META. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the total overlap.
What does CGGO own that IVV doesn't?
60 positions (51.3% of CGGO) are unique to CGGO, led by TSM, 000660 and 005930. In the other direction, 459 positions (58.7% of IVV) are unique to IVV.