CGGO vs IMTM: Holdings Overlap
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Capital Group · 104 holdings · $11.5B · as of 2026-05-31
IMTMiShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 313 holdings · $4.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGGO: 2026-05-31, IMTM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGGO and IMTM?
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO, by Capital Group) holds 104 positions; iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM, by iShares) holds 313. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 8.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 8.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14CGGO holds 104 · IMTM holds 313
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGO 12%·IMTM 12%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGO
90 of 104 positions (86.3% of the fund) are not held by IMTM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGO | IMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 39.1% | 10.0% |
| Financials | 10.4% | 36.0% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 20.2% |
| Materials | 3.5% | 8.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.3% | 1.9% |
| Other Sectors | 20.4% | 18.3% |
| Unclassified | 3.0% | 4.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of CGGO, 5% of IMTM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | -0.2% | +17.3% | +26.5% | +20.0% | — | — | 0.98% |
| IMTM | +2.7% | +12.9% | +21.7% | +21.3% | +10.1% | +10.4% | 4.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGO vs IMTM →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the overlap, led by ASML, BBVA and SAF.
 ASMLASML Holding NV | 2.34% | 4.05% | 2.34% |
|---|---|---|---|
 BBVABanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA | 1.02% | 1.51% | 1.02% |
 SAFSafran SA | 0.78% | 0.82% | 0.78% |
 GLESociete Generale SA | 0.94% | 0.77% | 0.77% |
 AEMAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd. | 0.73% | 1.09% | 0.73% |
 AIRAirbus SE | 1.00% | 0.65% | 0.65% |
 PRXProsus NV | 0.97% | 0.43% | 0.43% |
 7011Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. NPV | 0.41% | 1.01% | 0.41% |
 GLENPENGlencore PLC | 0.44% | 0.34% | 0.34% |
 PRUPrudential PLC | 1.05% | 0.31% | 0.31% |
 SAABBSaab AB, Class B | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
 BAYNBayer AG (Registered) | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
 AV-Aviva PLC | 0.54% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
 LYCLynas Rare Earths Ltd | 0.73% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGO and IMTM overlap?
CGGO and IMTM overlap by 8.6% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (CGGO holds 104 positions and IMTM holds 313), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGO and IMTM?
The two portfolios are 8.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGO and IMTM?
The largest positions held by both funds are ASML, BBVA, SAF, GLE and AEM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the total overlap.
What does CGGO own that IMTM doesn't?
90 positions (86.3% of CGGO) are unique to CGGO, led by TSM, MU and 000660. In the other direction, 299 positions (87.6% of IMTM) are unique to IMTM.